Peer Review Process

The journal's peer-review process follows the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process conducted by independent experts. We employ a double-blind review system, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process. Authors' identities are not disclosed to reviewers, and reviewers' identities are not disclosed to authors.

Authors must address all reviewer comments in a point-by-point response. If an author disagrees with a reviewer’s suggestion, they must provide a clear and well-reasoned explanation. This ensures a constructive dialogue between authors and reviewers, ultimately enhancing the quality of the manuscript.

A Letter of Acceptance (LoA) is issued once an article has completed the peer-review process, undergone all required revisions, and been formally accepted for publication in a journal issue.